Horwitz argues that with the advent of
increasing globalization and technology-fueled multitasking, society is
reverting to a state in which eating is dictated by one’s individual needs.
This is as opposed to a more concrete schedule, be it dependent upon eating at
certain times, in certain places, or with certain people. The end result of
this shift towards smaller, individualized meals is greater productivity,
possibly at the cost of traditional social structures and healthiness.
The
author here tends to illustrate his points by providing in-depth analysis of
examples. In order to describe the efficiency of the emerging “on-the-go”
system of eating, he describes a Campbell’s Soup At Hand can, and details the
large number of ways in which this seemingly simple object is designed to
promote the efficiency of the user. When he talks about the declining importance
of mealtime gathering, he provides the space station example, wherein the
designers assumed that a communal meal table was essential, only to have the
astronauts using it gradually come to the conclusion that it was increasingly
unnecessary. To illustrate the greater importance of a personal schedule in
comparison to the actual time of day, he describes how society has adapted to
globalization in order to make time-displacement due to air travel virtually
irrelevant, especially in regards to eating. He uses these examples to conclude
that we, as a society, are fulfilling our needs with regards to food
individually, and as such, are free to free to follow our own natural work
cycles, leading to an increase in productivity.
I
must admit that my own experiences do mirror the conclusions to which Horwitz
comes. In particular, I sometimes substitute an energy bar for lunch or
breakfast when I am rushed. While dinner remains a family affair in my house,
other meals are permissible to skip, and this does allow me much greater
freedom in my schedule. It gives me the freedom not only to work through these
times, but also to be where I choose when I eat them, as they are very
portable. As such, they provide the increase of in productivity, the “timeless
time”, and the “freedom of place” that Horwitz describes.
No comments:
Post a Comment